Plastics : Digitalization and Legacy Equipment Compatibility in the Plastic Industry

The plastic industry faces a unique challenge: how to bring decades-old manufacturing equipment into the digital age without replacing millions of dollars worth of perfectly functional machinery.
What is legacy equipment in plastics?
Legacy equipment refers to older manufacturing machines that were built before the digital revolution. Typically anything manufactured before 2000-2010.
In the plastic industry, this includes injection molding machines from the 1980s and 90s, extruders from the early 2000s, and blow molding equipment that may be 20-30 years old but still produces quality parts.
The challenge:
These machines were designed when "smart" meant having a simple digital display instead of analog dials. They can't naturally connect to modern networks, don't generate data automatically, and weren't designed to communicate with other equipment or management systems.
Why keep them:
A single injection molding machine can cost $100,000-$500,000.
If it's still producing quality parts reliably, replacing it just for digital capabilities doesn't make economic sense.
Understanding Industry 4.0 in the plastics context:
Industry 4.0 means creating "smart factories" where machines, systems, and people communicate seamlessly through digital networks.
In plastics manufacturing, this translates to:
- Machines that report their status automatically
- Production data that flows directly to management systems
- Predictive maintenance that prevents breakdowns
- Real-time quality monitoring and adjustment
- Automated scheduling and inventory management
The vision:
Instead of operators manually checking machines and writing down production numbers, everything flows automatically into systems that can optimize the entire operation.
Legacy compatibility approaches:
Sensor retrofit (Adding Digital Eyes and Ears):
- Concept: attach modern sensors to old machines to capture data they weren't designed to provide.
- Example: a 1995 Arburg injection molding machine at a automotive parts manufacturer was retrofitted with (Vibration sensors on the motor to detect wear patterns, temperature sensors on the barrel and mold, pressure sensors in the hydraulic system, current monitors on electrical system, optical sensors to count parts produced)
Implementation process:
- Assessment: engineers map all the data points needed from the machine
- Sensor selection: choose sensors that can attach without modifying the machine
- Installation: mount sensors using magnetic bases, clamps, or non-invasive methods
- Data collection: wireless transmitters send sensor data to central systems
- Integration: software translates sensor readings into meaningful production data
- Result: the 28-year-old machine now provides real-time data on cycle times, temperature profiles, pressure variations, and production counts - information that helps optimize quality and predict maintenance needs.
- Concept: Use gateway devices that act as translators between old machine languages and modern digital systems.
- Example: Sumitomo Demag implemented gateway solutions for their customers older injection molding machines. The gateway connects to the machine's existing control system and translates its simple outputs into modern communication protocols.
- Old machine output: simple voltage signals indicating "running," "stopped," "alarm"
- Gateway device: Interprets these signals and adds timestamps, context, and formatting
- Modern system input: receives structured data about machine status, production rates, and alerts
- Two-way communication: gateway can also send commands back to the machine for basic control
Concept:
Replace the old control system with a modern one while keeping the mechanical components.
Process:
- Mechanical assessment: verify that motors, valves, and sensors are compatible
- Control mapping: document how the old system controlled each function
- Modern design: create new control logic using modern programming methods
- Installation: replace control panels, wiring, and programming
- Testing: extensive testing to ensure the machine operates identically or better
- Connectivity: new system connects directly to plant networks
- Data collection: automatic logging of all process parameters
- Advanced features: better temperature control, more precise timing
- Maintenance: modern diagnostics and remote troubleshooting capability
- Cost: $50,000 retrofit versus a $300,000 new machine
Johnson controls automotive parts:
- Challenge: 25 injection molding machines from 1985-2005 needed integration into new MES (Manufacturing Execution System).
- Solution: hybrid approach combining multiple strategies.
Machine categories:
- Newest machines (2000-2005): direct network connection with minor software updates
- Mid-age machines (1995-2000): gateway devices for data translation
- Oldest machines (1985-1995): sensor retrofits plus manual data points
- Phase 1 (month 1-2): connect newest machines directly
- Phase 2 (month 3-4): install gateways on mid-age equipment
- Phase 3 (month 5-6): retrofit sensors on oldest machines
- Phase 4 (month 7-8): integrate all data streams and train operators
- 95% reduction in manual data collection
- 30% improvement in overall equipment effectiveness (OEE)
- 40% reduction in unplanned downtime through predictive maintenance
- Complete production traceability across all equipment ages
Medical device manufacturer case study:
- Challenge: FDA-regulated environment requiring full traceability with equipment spanning 20 years.
- Solution: comprehensive retrofit ensuring regulatory compliance while maintaining equipment qualification.
- All modifications must maintain equipment qualification
- Complete documentation of changes for FDA compliance
- Validation that retrofits don't affect product quality
- Traceability requirements for all production data
- Risk assessment: evaluate impact of each modification on product quality
- Validation planning: design tests to prove retrofits don't affect output
- Phased installation: implement changes during scheduled maintenance windows
- Documentation: complete change control documentation for regulatory compliance
- Validation execution: run qualification tests on all modified equipment
- Non-invasive monitoring: used clamp-on sensors to avoid breaking sealed systems
- Parallel data collection: ran old and new systems simultaneously during validation
- Backup systems: maintained ability to operate without digital systems if needed
- Audit trails: complete digital records of all changes and validations
Current limitations and solutions:
Technical limitations:
- Problem: some very old equipment simply cannot be retrofitted effectively.
- Solution: hybrid approach where critical functions get new equipment while supporting operations use retrofitted legacy systems.
- Problem: maintenance staff familiar with legacy equipment may not understand modern digital systems.
- Solution: gradual training programs and hybrid teams combining legacy and digital expertise.
- Problem: each legacy machine may require custom integration solutions.
- Solution: standardized retrofit kits and integration platforms that can adapt to different machine types.
Emerging technologies:
- Edge computing: small computers installed near legacy equipment provide local processing power and reduce network requirements.
- Artificial intelligence: AI systems learn to interpret legacy machine signals and predict optimal operating parameters.
- Augmented reality: AR systems help operators visualize digital information overlaid on physical legacy equipment.
Unlike Virtual Reality which creates a completely fake environment, AR adds digital elements to what you actually see around you.
Industry trends:
Retrofit-first mentality:
Companies increasingly evaluate retrofit options before considering equipment replacement.
Standardization:
Industry groups developing standard approaches for legacy integration.
Service models:
Equipment manufacturers offering "digitalization as a service" for legacy equipment.
Conclusion:
The plastic industry's approach to legacy equipment integration proves that the path to Industry 4.0 doesn't require throwing away decades of capital investment.
Instead, it requires clever engineering, strategic thinking, and recognition that old machines can learn new digital tricks when given the right technological assistance.
Comments
Post a Comment